A CSI Review must be undertaken by:
- a CSI Reviewer, Level 6 or above, who has completed the CSI Reviewer training, and
- a CSI Reviewer from the relevant district office who has had no previous significant involvement in the CSI subject to review.
|
You must save all relevant documentation in relation to the CSI Review to the family group file regardless of the outcome of the review. |
Receiving and allocating a CSI Reviewer
All requests for a CSI Review should be forwarded to the relevant district director or their delegate.
The district director or delegate allocates the CSI Review to a CSI Reviewer from the relevant district who has had no previous involvement in the CSI subject to review.
When the CSI Review is complex, contentious or when there is a potential conflict of interest, it may be appropriate for another district office or the PPU to undertake the CSI Review.
CSI Review process
Once the CSI Reviewer has been allocated the CSI Review, the Review should be completed within 30 working days of its allocation. Where this is not possible, you should advise the client of the delay and intended timeframe for completion.
You
must use the CSI Review and
must use the CSI Review Template.
The CSI Reviewer
must contact the person who requested the CSI Review
within seven working days of allocation, to discuss and provide them an opportunity for input into the CSI Review.
Form 232 can be sent to the person who requested the CSI Review, acknowledging their request.
The CSI Reviewer
must advise anyone else who received the CSI Outcome Letter (Form 230,
Form 231 or
Form 233) that a CSI Review is occurring. The letter
must outline the timeframe and offer them the opportunity for input into the CSI Review.
| The CSI Reviewer
must consider relevant Objective files and Assist records relating to the CSI. |
The CSI Reviewer may also consider any relevant information provided by significant people. Significant people can include anyone provided with a CSI Outcome Letter. The CSI Reviewer can contact other relevant parties at their discretion.
| The CSI Reviewer may consult or quality assure their review with their line manager, or seek consult with the PPU at any time. |
CSI Review outcome
The CSI Review will either uphold or change the original CSI outcome. The CSI Review
must consider if:
- procedural fairness was met
- relevant policies and practice guidance were adhered to
- the original decision was made based upon credible evidence, and
- the outcome is upheld or changed.
The outcomes can be:
- Harm of the child is not substantiated.
- Substantiated likelihood of significant harm (has or will occur) of the child.
- Substantiated significant harm (actual) of the child.
If… |
Then… |
Significant harm (actual) is substantiated | The CSI Reviewer may consider whether a person meets the criteria for being recorded as causing Actual Harm and posing a Continuing Risk to children (AHCR) |
The CSI Reviewer makes a new decision to record a person as AHCR | The CSI Reviewer must follow the guidance outlined in the entry Actual Harm Continuing Risk (AHCR) criteria |
|
Where the CSI Reviewer or another role delegated by the director do not agree on the recommended outcome of the CSI Review, the matter should be escalated to the relevant Executive Director for a final decision. |